Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Department of Chemistry, College of Education for Pure Sciences (Ibn Al-Haitham), University of Baghdad, Iraq
Abstract
The new liganed Schiff base named [(E)-3-hydroxy-4-((3,4,5-trimethoxybenzylidene)amino) naphthalene-1- sulfonic acid] was synthesized from 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyldehyde and 1-amino-2-aphthol-4-sulfonic acid in equal molar ratio. A series of new metal complexes' of the common molecular formulation [M(L)2(H2O)2].H2O are synthesized and characterized by IR, UV–Vis spectra, mass spectra, atomic absorption, elemental analyses, chloride content, magnetic susceptibility and conductivity measurements as well as thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA, DSC). Consistent with results of the magnetic and spectral studies, the advised geometrical structures for all of the prepared complexes have been octahedral formula.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
Introduction
Schiff base composites are considered with the presence of azomethine group (-CH=N-) as per consequence of reflux among aldehyde or ketone with primary amin [1]. Studies have shown that the azomethine group (-CH=N-) is a donor-acceptor group and is an acceptor through the π-orbital of the double bond, and a doner through the non-acceptor of electrons to the nitrogen atom of this group [2].The Schiff base is derived from benzaldehyde or its derivatives with aniline or its derivatives; the Schiff base molecule is uneven, as the benzene ring attached to the nitrogen atom is outside the level of the rest of the molecule, and it turns out that the compensators on the benzaldehyde molecule are more influential in the electronic distribution than the compensators on aniline cycle [3]. Schiff bases mainly frolic unlike other zones like the pharmacology as anti-fungal, anti-bacterial and anti-cancer agents [4]. Further, they are applied in manufacturing things like thermal Initiations in the Radical Polymerization [5].
Materials and Methods
All composites used were of highest purity (BDH, Fluka).
Instrumentation
TGA-DSC was characterized and analyzed. The FTIR-Spectra were recorded on Shimadzu 8400-s in a range of (400 cm-1 – 4000 cm-1) with the use of the KBr disk. 1H-NMR spectra were characterized and analyzed. CHNS was accomplished on Euro-EA Elemental.
Preparations of facilities
Preparation of New Schiff base ligand (E)-3-hydroxy-4-((3,4,5-trimethoxybenzylidene)amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid
In a round bottom flask, 3,4,5- dimethoxybenzaldehyde (5 mmol, 1 g) in 15 mL ethanol and 1-amino-2-aphthol-4-sulfonic acid (5 mmol, 1.219 g) in 15 ml ethanol was refluxed for 5 h. [6]. Then, the reaction flask was located in a freeze bath for several records, followed by filtering the precipitate and leaving it to dry, giving a pale green precipitate. The groundwork of Schiff base is illustrated in Scheme1.
Scheme 1: Schiff base Ligand preparation
Preparation of metallic complexes [Co(Ⅱ), Cu(Ⅱ), Ni(Ⅱ), Zn(Ⅱ), Mercury] through ligand (L)
The chelate facilities of ligand and metal (1:2) were arranged via the dissolution of 0.95 mmol (0.4 g) of the Schiff base in 10ml of solvent and added to KOH dissolved in 10 ml of absolute solvent. The consistent hydrated metal chloride salt of CoCl2.6H2O, CuCl2.2H2O=0.081 g, NiCl2.6H2O=0.114 g, HgCl2=0.130 g and ZnCl2=0.060 g was liquefied in absolute ethanol 10 mL varied with solvent of the ligand and refluxed for 3h on contents cooling. The facilities were divided out in every event. The produce was filtered, splashed with solvent then dehydrated below vacuity.
Results and discussion
Elemental analyses
Some of the physical and analytical characteristics of ligand as well as its complexes were examined, aimed at finding the chloride content.
Table 1: Physical characteristics and analytical data of ligands as well as their facilities
No. |
Compounds |
Color |
M.P. (℃) |
M.wt |
Calc./Found% |
|||||||
C |
H |
N |
S |
O |
M |
Cl |
|
|||||
1 |
C20H19NO7S |
Pala Green |
261-263 |
417.43 |
57.49 (57.47) |
4.55 (4.53) |
3.35 (3.33) |
7.66 (7.63) |
26.83 (26.80) |
- |
- |
|
2 |
[Co(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
Brown |
139-140 |
945.79 |
50.75 (50.73) |
4.44 (4.42) |
2.96 (2.94) |
6.76 (6.74) |
28.75 (28.73) |
6.23 (6.20) |
Nil |
|
3 |
[Ni(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
Dark Brown |
>300 |
945.45 |
50.76 (50.73) |
4.44 (4.41) |
2.96 (2.94) |
6.76 (6.73) |
28.76 (28.74) |
6.19 (6.18) |
Nil |
|
4 |
[Cu(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
Red |
147-148 |
950.4 |
50.50 (50.48) |
4.41 (4.39) |
2.94 (2.93) |
6.73 (6.71) |
28.61 (28.60) |
6.68 (6.66) |
Nil |
|
5 |
[Zn(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
Dark Brown |
116-118 |
952.24 |
50.40 (50.39) |
4.41 (4.40) |
2.94 (2.92) |
6.72 (6.70) |
28.56 (28.53) |
6.86 (6.84) |
Nil |
|
6 |
[Hg(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
Yellowish Brown |
>300 |
1087 |
44.15 (44.12) |
3.86 (3.84) |
2.57 (2.55) |
5.88 (5.85) |
25.02 (25.00) |
18.45 (18.40) |
Nil |
FT-IR of ligand and Facilities
The infra-red spectral data of the Schiff base ligands as well as their complexes are listed in Table 2. Infra-red spectra of complexes were equated with those of free ligand for the purpose of regulating sites coordination, which could be complicated in the chelation. The band in infra-red spectrum of the free ligands at 1172 cm-1 was transferrable to stretching shaking carbonyl group of Schiff base ligand that was lifted to lower frequency in IR spectra of facilities at 1168cm-1. The appearance of band in the range of 582-489cm-1 in infra-red spectra of all of the facilities came as a result of the υ(M-O) validates [7]. The band at (1658 cm-1) in free ligand’s infra-red spectrum might be a result of stretching vibration of the imine group υ(C=N) that was changed to a lower or higher frequency; in infra-red spectra of facilities of Cu(II) and Hg(II) rose in to higher frequency, whereas the facilities of Ni(II), Co(II), and Zn(II) fell to lower frequency designated for the harmonization of ligand with metal ion through the N atom [8]. This was further validated by the presence of a newfangled band in range (613-594 cm-1) transferrable to υ(M-N) [9,10]. It was established that the ligand acted the role of bidentate ligand harmonized to metal ions through O atom of the carbonyl group of benzaldehyde and N atom of imine group for all facilities.
Table 2: Characteristics of infrared bands of absorption of ligand (L) as well as its facilities in cm-1
υ(M-O) |
υ(M-N) |
υ(C-O) |
υ(C=N) |
υ(OH) υ (OH) |
Compounds |
-------- |
-------- |
1172 |
1658 |
3240 1315 |
C20H19NO7S |
489 |
609 |
1168 |
1539 |
3348 1315 |
[Co(L)2(H2O(2].H2O |
528 |
605 |
1161 |
1550 |
3402 1361 |
[Ni(L)2(H2O(2].H2O |
582 |
613 |
1168 |
1651 |
3448 1365
|
[Cu(L)2(H2O(2].H2O |
528 |
594 |
1168 |
1546 |
3417 1357 |
[Zn (L)2(H2O(2].H2O |
513 |
597 |
1168 |
1635 |
3414 1354 |
[Hg(L)2(H2O(2].H2O |
UV-Vis
The UV-Vis of ligand and its Ni(II), Cu(II), Co(II), Zn(II) and Mercury facilities were deliberate and spectra1 data were registered as displayed in Table 3. UV-Vis of Schiff base ligands has been described mostly by three absorption top at (235 nm) consigned to (π→π*), at (345nm) that has been allocated to (n→π*) and at (470nm) allocated to Charge transfer [11]. Those electronic transitions were lifted near lower or higher frequency in electronic spectra of all of the set facilities [12-14].
Table 5: UV-Vis spectra of ligand as well as its chelate facilities
Compound |
λ(nm) |
υ(cm-1) |
εmax L/mol cm |
Transition |
ΛmS.cm2.mole-1 |
C20H19NO7S |
235 |
42553 |
457 |
π→π* |
-------- |
345 |
28985 |
1508 |
n→π* |
||
470 |
21276 |
25 |
C.T |
||
[Co(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
237 |
42194 |
4440 |
π→ π* |
3.41 |
344 |
29069 |
2389 |
n→π* |
||
473 |
21141 |
42 |
4T1g→4T1g(p) |
||
603 |
16583 |
15 |
4T1g→ 4A2g |
||
927 |
10787 |
4 |
4T1g→ 4T2g |
||
[Ni(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
241 |
41493 |
1419 |
π → π* |
2.16 |
344 |
29069 |
2377 |
n→π* |
||
480 |
20833 |
217 |
3A2g→ 3T1g(P) |
||
745 |
13422 |
28 |
3A2g→ 3T1g |
||
789 |
12674 |
19 |
3A2g→3T2g |
||
[Cu(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
245 |
40816 |
1693 |
π → π* |
17.72 |
276 |
36231 |
1457 |
π → π* |
||
344 |
29069 |
2416 |
n→π* |
||
502 |
199203 |
2500 |
2B1g → 2Eg |
||
888 |
11261 |
9 |
2B1g → 2A2g |
||
[Zn (L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
241 |
41493 |
1133 |
π → π* |
9.48 |
281 |
35587 |
933 |
n→π* |
||
419 |
23866 |
396 |
C.T |
||
[Hg(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
237 |
42194 |
771 |
π → π* |
14.17 |
348 |
28735 |
682 |
n→π* |
||
473 |
21141 |
130 |
C.T |
Magnetic measurement
µS+L= B.M
µ B.M, S=n/ 2
µ B.M
XM=Xg×Mwt (1)
XA =XM – D (2)
µ eff= 2.82 (3) B.M
Co(II) composite displays magnetic moment µ eff (4.82BM) that is consistent with 3 unpaired electrons. This significance submits octahedral environment around ion of Co (II) [15]. Ni(II) complex displays magnetic moment µeff. (2.80 BM) at room temperature that is resultant to 2 unpaired electrons. This significance directs octahedral geometry about Nickel(II) ion [16]. Cu(II) complex indications µeff (1.75 BM) conform to unpaired electrons. This value suggests octahedral environment around ion of Cu(II) [17]. The value of the magnetic moment µeff of Zn(II) associates with Mercury composite (0.00 B.M) for the reason of being diamagnetic in nature (d10) [17].
1HNMR
In mixture, as in solid state, this marvel was set by infra-red and NMR spectra.1HNMR ligand spectrum in the DMSO-d6 revealed signal at chemical shift (δH =9.6 ppm, s) credited to the one proton of the hydroxyl group phenol δ(OH) [18], and at (8.7 ppm, s) credited to the proton of the hydroxyl group sulfonic δ(OH)). Resonance values at the chemical shifting (δH = 6.7 -7.6 ppm, m) are flexible to the aromatic ring protons and at (3.0, 3.2 ppm, s) official to nine protons of (-OCH3).
GC-mass of ligand and complexes
Electro-spray mass spectrum of ligand displays parent ion top at (M/Z)=(417) that agrees with [M+], other rubbles as well as their comparative abundance and disintegration pattern has been presented. Electro-spray mass spectrum of Co(II) complexes illustrates parent ion top at (M/Z)=(928) that agrees with [M+], other fragments as well as their comparative abundance and disintegration configuration is exposed. Electro-spray mass spectrum of Ni(II)complexes confirm the parent ion top at (M/Z)=(927), corresponding to [M+], other fragments as well as their comparative abundance and disintegration patterns having been illustrated.
Thermal decomposition of ligands and Cu(II), Zn(II) Complexes
The thermogram of prepared ligand (C20H19NO17S) was carried out by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential calorimetry (DSC), in an inert atmosphere using argon gas at an average temperature of 10°Cmin-1 and a weight of (26mg) of the sample. The TGA curve of the prepared ligand (L) shows that it undergoes one phase of weight loss [19,20]. Thermal study of the complex CuC40H42N2O17S2 was carried out in an inert atmosphere of argon at an average temperature of 10°Cmin-1 with a weight of (21 mg). The TGA curve shows the complex going through four stages of weight loss.
Thermal study of the complex ZnC40H42N2O17S2 was carried out in an inert atmosphere of argon at an average temperature of 10 °Cmin-1 by the weight of 17mg [21]. The TGA curve shows that the complex had one phase of weight loss.
Table4: Thermal analysis of the ligand as well as its complexes
Assignments |
Estimated(calculated) |
De-composition Temperature Initial-inal(℃) |
Stages |
Compound |
|
Total mass loss |
Mass Loss |
||||
-C20H13NO6S |
24.62 (24.65) |
24.62(24.65) |
115-597.547 |
1 |
L |
-C2H12O3 |
18.48 (18.50) |
1.86 (1.87) |
60-166.897 |
1 |
[Cu(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
H3SO4- |
2.18 (2.19) |
166.879-246.4 |
2 |
||
-C19H22O9S |
9.42 (9.43) |
246.4-392.132 |
3 |
||
-CuC11H2NO |
5.02 (5.03) |
392.132-596.753 |
4 |
||
-C40H39NO15S2 |
14.95 (14.96) |
14.95(14.96) |
120-594.869 |
1 |
[Zn(L)2(H2O)2].H2O |
Conclusion
The aim of this research was to create a new ligand containing the azomethine group (-CH=N-) as a donor-acceptor group countered with around transition metal ions in Ni(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and mercury to offer a series of new metal complexes of the common molecular formulation [M(L)2(H2O)2].H2O. The metal complexes were proved to have an octahedral formula.
Acknowledgments
The authors extend sincere thanks and appreciation to the reviewers for their appreciable comments.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors' contributions
All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting, and revising the paper and agreed to be responsible for all the aspects of this work.
Conflict of Interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
ORCID:
Wurood Ali Jaafar
https://www.orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-7622
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Majida Ibrahim Obaid, Wurood Ali Jaafar. Formation, Characterization and Thermal Study of Novel Schiff Base Ligand From Sulfonic Acid and Its Complexes with Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Hg(II) Type NO. Chem. Methodol., 2022, 6(6) 457-462
- Abdullah A.M., Khan S.A., Molecules, 2010, 15:6850 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Qin J., Yang Z., Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 2015, 303-304:99 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Raczuk E., Dmochowska B., Samaszko-Fiertek J., Madaj J., Molecules, 2022, 27:787 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Abdulghani S.M., Al-Rawi M.S., Tomma J.H., Methodol., 2021, 6:59 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Saeed R.S., Al-rawi M.S., J. Pharm. Res., 2020, 12 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Sabah A.A., Al-Rawi M.S., Tomma J.H., Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., 2020, 14 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Fayyadh B.M., Jaafar W.A., Sarhan B.M., J. Drug Deliv. Technol., 2021, 11:64 [Google Scholar]
- Carey F.A., R.M. Giuliano. Organic Chemistry. McGraw-Hill. New York, 2011 [Google Scholar]
- Abdulghani S.M., Al-Rawi M.S., Tomma J.H., Methodol., 2022, 6:59 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Vogel I., A textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed., Longman Group Ltd, London, 1974 [Google Scholar]
- Jaafar W.A., Saeed R.S., Rev. Pharm., 2020, 11:134 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Jabarah Z., Mahdi I.S., Jaafar W., J. Chem., 2019, 62:1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Al Shemary R.K., Abdul Karim L.K., Jaafar W.A., Baghdad Sci. J., 2017, 14 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Lahneche Y.D., Boulebd H., Benslimane M., Bencharif M., Belfaitah A., Coord. Chem., 2019, 72:3156 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Jaafer Al-Sa’idy W.A., Al-Jeboori M.J., Hasan H.A., Transition Met. Chem., 2009, 34:593 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Patel A., Bari S., Talele G., Patel J., Sarangapani M., J. Pharm. Res., 2006, 5:249 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- Wood G., Chemistry of the Elements, Ed. NN and A. Earnshow, 1998 [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, Shaimaa A., Sajid M. Lateef, and Ismaeel Y. Majeed, J. Pharm. Technol., 2020, 13:3001 [Google Scholar]
- Jirjees V.Y., Al‐Hamdani A.A.S., Wannas N.M., Farqad A.R., Adnan D., Al Zoubi W., Phys. Org. Chem., 2020, 34:e4169 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
- El-Sonbati A.Z., Diab M.A., El-Bindary A.A., Mohamed G.G., Morgan S.M., Abou-Dobara M.I., Nozha S.G., Mol. Liq., 2016, 215:423 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]